CO2 emissions.

An Alternative To Issue CO2 emissions.
The process of handling CO2 gas emissions by capturing and saving is one that makes the technology we can still use fossil fuel without being followed consequences of climate change.

But behind the use of this technology will certainly require a larger investment side of R & D. CO2 emission is formed when we make burning coal or gas engine power source for electricity generation. This combustion process will produce CO2 which is the main cause of the gas effect "glass house" that would changes in climate can poison the earth and our marine waters.

CCS or abbreviation of the term "Carbon Capture and Storage" is a process that could fisikokimia separating CO2 gas, dissolving it in a low pressure condition, and then transported through pipes to and then stored in geological porous rock formations at depths of more than 800 m below the seabed. A safe place that can be used to store oil, gas and salt water solvent that can not be used for any purpose.

CCS directly proven to reduce CO2 emissions, so that industrialized countries can continue to use coal and gas as fuel for power plants to continue to meet targets to reduce production of CO2 emissions up to 60-80% until the year 2050.

Technology is important and so vital was produced by chemists and chemical techniques. Stages of CCS technology is the most expensive and energy consuming large amounts is in the process of separation of CO2 from the gases released in the burning of fossil fuels. Next is the process of O2 in gas purification to produce clean combustion. Until now, the second stage of this process can only be done by using a solvent in large amounts, or take advantage of the membrane which is a technology that has a low performance can only be done by using technology that is less secure because the use of materials or processes are dangerous and poisonous. Thus be one important thing that needs to be continuously studied and developed to improve CCS technology.

If indeed we will make CCS as a technology that can reduce CO2 emissions will be the future, then we must immediately make a significant development in three different sector of technology, legal policy and the business side. As one example of the UK is one country that has strong legal policy is very good, but still failed to reduce the costs incurred from the use of CCS technology so that in terms of business can not meet the criteria of a promising unit and can generate profits . Until now, even though CCS technology is not one technology that is considered the most expensive because it is an investment in the long run, but also a CCS is not the most expensive technology to be applied with good ability to continue to reduce CO2 emission of our earth.

The conclusion to be drawn from the description above is the first that CCS allows us to separate the CO2, making it a liquid (dissolving) and save it to reduce emissions. Second, although quite expensive separation stage but the overall CCS can be classified as one of the cheaper options for reducing gas production "glass house". Third, this technology be developed and explored by various industries or companies in the energy sector in all parts of the world, and last without berkemanjutan investment and a stable CO2 price of the CCS will not be commercialized in the energy sector markets.

An Alternative To Issue CO2 emissions.
The process of handling CO2 gas emissions by capturing and saving is one that makes the technology we can still use fossil fuel without being followed consequences of climate change.

But behind the use of this technology will certainly require a larger investment side of R & D. CO2 emission is formed when we make burning coal or gas engine power source for electricity generation. This combustion process will produce CO2 which is the main cause of the gas effect "glass house" that would changes in climate can poison the earth and our marine waters.

CCS or abbreviation of the term "Carbon Capture and Storage" is a process that could fisikokimia separating CO2 gas, dissolving it in a low pressure condition, and then transported through pipes to and then stored in geological porous rock formations at depths of more than 800 m below the seabed. A safe place that can be used to store oil, gas and salt water solvent that can not be used for any purpose.

CCS directly proven to reduce CO2 emissions, so that industrialized countries can continue to use coal and gas as fuel for power plants to continue to meet targets to reduce production of CO2 emissions up to 60-80% until the year 2050.

Technology is important and so vital was produced by chemists and chemical techniques. Stages of CCS technology is the most expensive and energy consuming large amounts is in the process of separation of CO2 from the gases released in the burning of fossil fuels. Next is the process of O2 in gas purification to produce clean combustion. Until now, the second stage of this process can only be done by using a solvent in large amounts, or take advantage of the membrane which is a technology that has a low performance can only be done by using technology that is less secure because the use of materials or processes are dangerous and poisonous. Thus be one important thing that needs to be continuously studied and developed to improve CCS technology.

If indeed we will make CCS as a technology that can reduce CO2 emissions will be the future, then we must immediately make a significant development in three different sector of technology, legal policy and the business side. As one example of the UK is one country that has strong legal policy is very good, but still failed to reduce the costs incurred from the use of CCS technology so that in terms of business can not meet the criteria of a promising unit and can generate profits . Until now, even though CCS technology is not one technology that is considered the most expensive because it is an investment in the long run, but also a CCS is not the most expensive technology to be applied with good ability to continue to reduce CO2 emission of our earth.

The conclusion to be drawn from the description above is the first that CCS allows us to separate the CO2, making it a liquid (dissolving) and save it to reduce emissions. Second, although quite expensive separation stage but the overall CCS can be classified as one of the cheaper options for reducing gas production "glass house". Third, this technology be developed and explored by various industries or companies in the energy sector in all parts of the world, and last without berkemanjutan investment and a stable CO2 price of the CCS will not be commercialized in the energy sector markets.